The Feeling Is Mutuals: Funds Aren't Such Bad Performers

UW Finance Professor Wayne Ferson has been tracking the history of mutual fund performance for years, comparing orthodox and unorthodox measurements. Using traditional performance standards, a financial analyst looking at 67 mutuals funds in the 1970s and '80s would find that two-thirds performed worse than the S&P 500.

But before you take your money to a straight index fund, Ferson suggests looking at non-traditional performance measurements. During bull markets, so much money pours into mutual funds that managers don't invest it all at once. Using a model that does not penalize funds for holding more cash during a bullish market, Ferson found that only 52.4 percent of the sample funds underperformed the S&P 500.

"The bias is to see mutual funds as underperforming. My studies seem to indicate that those criticisms may have been overblown," he says.

However, mutual funds managers are also considered bad at market timing. "My current project tends to confirm that," Ferson says. "Mutual funds tend to sit on more cash under high market returns."--Tom Griffin

Top 10 Financial Web Sites
Return to the Beginning of "Market Time"
Business School Home Page

Send a letter to the editor at columns@u.washington.edu.

Table of Contents